- INTEL LINPACK BENCHMARK V11.3.0.004 UPDATE
- INTEL LINPACK BENCHMARK V11.3.0.004 FULL
- INTEL LINPACK BENCHMARK V11.3.0.004 PC
On the Top500, it achieved a LINPACK score of 442.01 petaflops.
INTEL LINPACK BENCHMARK V11.3.0.004 FULL
The results this time were made with Fugaku’s full complement of 158,976 nodes fit into 432 racks. The results of the TOP500, HPCG and HPL-AI rankings were announced on June 28, and the details of the Graph 500 will be revealed on July 1 at ISC High Performance 2021 Digital, which is currently being held as an online event.
This includes the TOP500 list as well as the HPCG, a performance ranking for computing methods often used for real-world applications, HPL-AI, which ranks supercomputers based on their performance on single- and half-precision computing typically used in artificial intelligence applications, and the Graph 500 ranking, which ranks systems based on graph analytic performance, an important element in data-intensive workloads. TOKYO, JThe supercomputer Fugaku, jointly developed by RIKEN and Fujitsu, has successfully retained the top spot for three consecutive terms on all four of the major high-performance computer rankings. Now I'm wondering, which profile is better to 24/7 use.ġst profile has lower spikes (1.336V) with average load.Ģnd profile has higher spikes (1.336/1.344 sometimes) but lower full load Vcore - 1. 1987 - Covering the Fastest Computers in the World and the People Who Run Them Why in this test load voltage is lower? Is Linpack without AVX less demanding than with AVX? Or maybe it's higher so Vdroop is higher? What do you think?ĮDIT: Settings with Level 4 are stable - 7.5 H OCCT Linpack AVX passed. I wonder about load voltage (1.304V or even 1.296V) when OCCT Linpack without AVX is running. These settings gives some spikes to 1.344V at average load. Additional Turbo Voltage set to minimum = +0.004V. Additional Turbo Voltage set to minimum = +0.004VĪbove settings gives some spikes to 1.336 V at average load. In normal usage there is no problem at all until now. It passed 5.5 hours of OCCT Small Data Set test.
INTEL LINPACK BENCHMARK V11.3.0.004 UPDATE
Ok guys, here is the little update to my OC results:Īctually I have one profile which I think is stable (99%).
INTEL LINPACK BENCHMARK V11.3.0.004 PC
just what's best for you under the anticipated loads and conditions you expose your PC to. Like most things PC related, there is no "best" for everyone.
To put it in simpler terms, if you live near the shore at 75 feet above sea level, when you add a trailer hitch to your compact SUV to haul your new 260 pound Skidoo to the beach 14 miles away, is there really any value to testing the hitch and engine / tranny / fuel mixture by hauling a 10,000 pound load up and over the Rocky Mountains ? Your hitch / SUV will never see that load nor the thin air of the Rockies. but do you care since PC will never see similar loadings again ? Yes, it might not get by synthetics because you hit temps that aren't comfy. It could very will be that a OC limited by OC temps to 4.8 Ghz using synthetics, can reach 5.0 Ghz under RoG Real Bench. OTOH, I have had 24 stable synthetic OCs fail under a multi tasking benchmark in < 20 minutes. the question is, is their value to you ? As the saying goes, many folk "won't be able to sleep at night" knowing that there's some set of conditions which could be created, even artificially, that would make an OC unstable. I am not saying there is no value to using synthetics. Your stable OC will be significantly lower than it otherwise would be because no set of conditions will ever place such a single task loading on your PC again.
conditions which your CPU will never be exposed to in its liufetime, then test will one of, or even, ALL of the synthetics. If your goal is to be able to say you tested your OC under the most extreme and unrealistic conditions. If your goal is test stability in a multitasking environment using real world applications to get the best OC you can then RoG Real Bench is your best bet.
0 kommentar(er)
